President Barack Obama’s First Ad of 2012

President Barack Obama’s First Ad of 2012

Poignant, honest, accurate… Obama’s first ad tells the truth in hopes Americans do not notice just like 2008.

embedded by Embedded Video

YouTube Direkt

About the Author

TEApublican has written 176 stories on this site.

An artjournalism storyteller with 1/3 smart alec tea party angst, 2/3's creative artist republican, Dave Davidson is the TIR photographer and author of 2 dozen books including "Huckisms" and his latest book, "You May Be A TEApublican".

Herman Cain in Iowa: We Need An Empowerment Society, Not an Entitlement Society » Caffeinated Thoughts

He shared three of his guiding principles:

  1. Do the right thing. Challenging Obama – “it was not right to sue the state of Arizona when they were just trying to defend themselves.”  He said it was wrong to not defend DOMA.
  2. We have to lead this nation from an entitlement society to an empowerment society.  “There is no such thing as a Department of Happy.”  He said government can’t create jobs, they need to get out of the way so jobs can be created.  The people’s problem need to be addressed at the state level, and entitlement programs need to be restructured so that can happen.
  3. It’s not about us.  The founding fathers did their job, he said, we must be the defending fathers.  He said we must defend the unborn.  We need to defend the future of this nation.  “It’s not about us, it’s about the grandchildren.”

Politico Misreads Mike Huckabee Supporters in Iowa » Caffeinated Thoughts

We are all subject to making mistakes, as I am sure Mike Huckabee will be first to tell you. As I pointed out recently, many pundits and pols have taken to prognosticating, pontificating and predicting the demise of the Mike Huckabee for President 2012 candidacy. He is not running, he will not run, he cannot run, he should not run, he must not run. Even, “Don’t run, Mike”. No one yet has said he didn’t run. Previously I debunked the myths that his home or Fox contract will keep him out.

Now let’s bring the story up to date. First, there is the issue of Eric Woolson, who met with Huckabee during his Simple Government book tour last week. He has now announced he is going to work to promote Tim Pawlenty if he decides to run. Woolson is one of many professional political insiders who have worked for various campaigns, including Huckabee’s 2007 effort in Iowa.

Huckabee has made two things clear. First, he cannot take concrete steps to begin a run for presidency until he is certain he is going to run, otherwise, he will lose his contracts with ABC Radio and Fox News. Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich have already been “booted off” Fox for bellying up too close to the presidential bar. Second, it is clear Huckabee has not decided whether he will run or not, or has kept the decision to himself. He could not even wisely tell close associates like Woolson and Bob Vander Plaats that “yes, I am running”. One leak or misstep and he would be dumped in the pool, still wearing a suit and tie. So no one, especially Huckabee, blames Woolson for taking the bird in hand instead of waiting for the two in the bush, if that is his reasoning.

Politico shows how presumption can cause you to mess up the story. In the latest rendition of the “hardened conventional wisdom” that Huckabee won’t run, they lead their story with a picture of four female Huckabee supporters wearing M-I-K-E on their T-shirts at a rally in 2007. The AP picture has this caption:

“Iowa conservatives rally for Mike Huckabee in 2007. They don’t have a standard-bearer today”

 

 

 

 

 

 

The problem for Politico is, these same four young ladies showed up last week at the book tour in Iowa, just as enthusiastic as ever:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I know the anti-Hucks are out in full force wishin’ and a prayin’, and a hopin’ he won’t run.   But a picture paints a thousand words.

HatTip: Granny T at Huck’s Army.

Brilliant. Rand Paul Links Government Bureaucrats to Busted Toilets (Video) | The Gateway Pundit

Brilliant. Rand Paul Links Government Bureaucrats to Busted Toilets (Video)

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, March 10, 2011, 9:46 PM

 

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) went off on some big government bureaucrat during the Energy and Natural Resources Committee this week. Paul questioned the Department of Energy’s commitment to protecting consumer choice during consideration of Appliance/Light Bulb Energy-Efficiency Legislation.

This was terrific – Sit back and enjoy.

Hat Tip Ed
My FOX Phoenix reported:

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul told a Senate Committee on Thursday that his toilet doesn’t work.

And the US government is to blame.

Paul, a Republican, blamed his plumbing conundrum on federal legislation that forces Americans to buy more energy efficient appliances.

“Light bulbs, refrigerators, toilets, you name it. You can’t go around your house without being told what to buy,” Paul said.

“You restrict my purchases. You don’t care about my choices. You don’t care about the consumer.

“Frankly, my toilets don’t work in my house, and I blame you and people like you who want to tell me what I can install in my house. I find it insulting.”

Santorum Shines, Cain Impresses at IFFC Event

Santorum Shines, Cain Impresses at IFFC Event

By Craig Robinson

The Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition (IFFC)was the focus of the political world yesterday as it hosted five potential 2012 presidential candidates at their annual spring fundraiser.  An over-flow crowd of over 1500 people packed the Point of Grace Church in Waukee, where the event was held.  Governor Terry Branstad, who addressed the crowd, called the IFFC gathering the first significant event in the lead up to the 2012 caucuses.

The event, which was covered by hundreds of journalists from around the country, also attracted Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren, who filmed her show live from Point of Grace last night.  The main attractions of the night were Newt Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty, Rick Santorum, Herman Cain, and Buddy Roamer, but Governor Branstad, Congressman Steve King, and Ralph Reed were also featured prominently. Pete Ricketts, the National Republican Committeeman from Nebraska and owner of the Chicago Cubs, introduced each of the candidates.

Unlike previous events the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition have held, this year’s event looked professionally produced.  In fact, it looked and felt like a national debate put on by a major news network.  The folks at the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition should be very proud of the type of event they were able to produce last night.  They should be equally proud of the massive crowd that attended.

While the Iowa Faith and Freedom Coalition was a big winner, let’s look at how each of the potential 2012 presidential candidates placed after sharing the same stage.

1. Rick Santorum:

If any candidate had a lot on the line at last night’s event, it was Rick Santorum.  The 1500 or so people who attended this event are the ones he needs to convince that he’s the horse to back in the Iowa caucuses.  Not only did Santorum deliver a heartfelt speech that addressed the social issues that those in attendance are passionate about, but he also made it clear that he’s just not saying that these issues are worth fighting for.  He’s actually led the fight on them.

Santorum explained that his battles to advance a socially conservative agenda have come at a price.  Even though Santorum led the fight in the Senate on welfare reform and medical savings accounts, the media always referred to him as an ultra-conservative because of his efforts to fight for pro-life and pro-family causes.

“My kids used to think my first name was Ultra,” Santorum told the crowd.  “Once you fight for the moral fabric of your country, you’re labeled. I’m Ultra because I share your values, and I fought for them,” he told the audience.

Santorum’s pro-family accomplishments are more impressive then the other four candidates who shared the stage last night combined.  While Gingrich talked about what executive orders he would issue on day one of his presidency and Tim Pawlenty bragged about his fiscal stewardship while being the governor of a blue state, Santorum reminded people that he led the fight to end the practice of partial birth abortions that it was he who led the fight for the unborn victims of violence act, and it was he who led the charge on the born alive infant protection act, which simply states that if a baby is born alive during an attempted abortion, the child is extended legal protection.

Besides Newt Gingrich wanting to allow Israel the right to locate its capitol in the city of Jerusalem, Santorum was the only candidate to touch on foreign policy.  Santorum talked about how Republicans, including President George W. Bush, failed to understand that they were losing the battle in America, not Iraq in 2006.  Santorum said, “This isn’t a war on terror, just like WWII wasn’t a war on blitzkrieg.  We are at war with jihadist.  They hate us because of who we are.  I took on that battle and continue to do so.”

Santorum also mentioned that he supported the Iran freedom and support act, which sowed the seeds of freedom inside of Iran.  Santorum then criticized the current administration for sitting on the sidelines or siding with the mullahs in Iran and Libya.

Santorum is not as good of a speaker as Mike Huckabee was in 2007 and 2008, but what he lacks in that department he makes up for with substance and results.  His record of accomplishment matters to those that attended last night’s event.  Those people might not be ready to join his effort right now, but when people start making decisions on who they support, he’s going to be on their list.  Santorum performance last night reminded me a lot of what Huckabee did in April of 2007 when he shared the stage with nine other 2008 Republican candidates at a Republican Party of Iowa event.

2. Tim Pawlenty

Santorum was the clear winner last night, but the battle for second place wasn’t quite so clear.  I think Pawlenty earned the spot despite referring to Steve Scheffler, the event’s organizer, as Chuck Scheffler.  Not only did this occur three times during his speech, but TheIowaRepublican.com was told it also happened a couple times in the private reception before the event as well.  It’s hard to understand how Pawlenty’s impressive Iowa staff allowed that to happen so often last night.

Like many of Pawlenty’s speeches, they start slow and finish strong.  For the first half of the speech, Pawlenty told a few jokes.  One was a hit, while the other one was a flop.  He then recounted stories about President Lyndon Johnson and President Ronald Reagan.  The stories were great, but it I can’t vote for Reagan in 2012.

Pawlenty then switched gears and became the candidate the field so desperately needs, a strong governor who is proud of what he accomplished during their time in office.   Some of the accomplishments that Pawlenty touted were reducing spending in Minnesota for the first time, actually cutting taxes twice, and paying teachers based on performance.

He also did the best job of any candidate in tying his record as governor to the current events of the day.  In 2005, Pawlenty’s differences with the Minnesota Democrats led to a state government shutdown.  He also didn’t budge when unionized bus drivers demand exorbitant retirement benefits.  His stance led to a 41-day transit strike.  Pawlenty also noted that he was one of only four governors who received an “A” from the CATO institute.

Pawlenty then closed his speech with what has become his “New Birth of Freedom” close.  “My friends, none of this is going to be easy.  If prosperity were easy, everybody around the world would be prosperous. If freedom were easy, everybody around the world would be free. And, if security were easy, everybody around the world would be secure,” Pawlenty said.  He then added, “Valley Forge wasn’t easy. Settling the West wasn’t easy. Winning World War II wasn’t easy. Going to the moon wasn’t easy. This ain’t about easy.”

Pawlenty’s speech filled the room with energy, but by the end of it, he seems to be losing his voice.  It also seemed a little forced or unnatural for him.  Pawlenty is a very nice calm person, but his rousing close is most likely a tactic to overcome his perceived charisma deficit.  Overall, Pawlenty scored well with the crowd but didn’t have the pro-life record or testimony that Santorum was able to offer.

3. Herman Cain

If I was working for one of these candidates, the one speaking spot that would have made me grimace is one that followed Herman Cain.  Cain is a phenomenal orator, and his speaking abilities allowed him to fit right in with the more established candidates he shared the stage with last night.

Cain’s fiery and enthusiastic speech was extremely well received by the crowd.  He was interrupted twelve times by applause.  The former Godfather’s Pizza CEO and former Chairman of the Kansas City Federal Reserve, set a high bar that was difficult for the others to follow.   The other candidates spent the rest of the night trying to measure up to his performance, and none could match Cain’s performance quality.

Cain laid out a vision for America based on three guiding principles: (1) do the right thing, (2) lead the nation from an entitlement society to an empowerment society, and (3) it’s not about us, it’s about the grandchildren.  Much of the crowd was likely seeing and hearing Cain for the first time.  He made about as good an initial impression as one could make.  Herman Cain helped his presidential aspirations Monday night.

The only problem with Cain’s speech is that, once again, he failed to give credit to Benjamin Mays, with whose words Cain began his speech.  It would be one thing if Cain was so well known that the audience knows that the words he began his speech with were not his own, but neither he nor Mays, who is one of Cain’s heroes, is well known enough to forgo a proper citation.

4. Newt Gingrich

Newt Gingrich had the unenviable task of immediately following Cain.  He knew it would be a tough act to follow, so he started his speech by joking that he just told Cain, “I’m stealing as much of that as I can.” Gingrich’s speech lacked the fire and passion of Cain’s and seemed to drag a bit in the beginning.   However, the former U.S. House Speaker eventually won the crowd over by continually focusing on a “power of the people” theme.

Gingrich is the idea man of the Republican Party, and that was on full display Monday night. His promise to issue four executive orders on his first day in office drew cheers from the crowd.  They included eliminating White House “czars”, stopping taxpayer funding for abortions in foreign countries, restoring conscience clauses for healthcare workers and telling the State Department to respect the sovereignty of other nations, particularly Israel.  Gingrich was interrupted by applause 11 times during his speech.

Gingrich didn’t hurt himself at last night’s event but he didn’t do anything to set himself apart from the other candidates either.  Last month at the Iowa Renewable Fuels Summit, Gingrich blew the doors off of the place.  He didn’t have the same sort of performance last night in front of a crowd that is sure to attend the caucuses next year.

5. Buddy Roemer

The biggest unknown of the group was former Louisiana Governor Buddy Roemer.  His speech drew the most laughs from the crowd.  Roemer’s message started to resonate with some, but it dragged on way too long.  He focused on his extensive resume as a former congressman and governor.  Then he shifted to Washington, D.C., corruption, which struck a chord with the crowd.

However, Roemer spent way too much time talking about how to grow his campaign.  His plan too closely resembled a pyramid scheme, and I wondered if he was going to ask people to buy some Amway products.   He also quoted a Robert Frost poem near the end that seemed totally lost on the crowd.  Roemer claims he would not accept any individual donations over $100 and no PAC money for his campaign.  The crowd appreciated his points, but the speech would have been much better if it was 10 minutes shorter.

Huckabee: Why wouldn’t he?

Huckabee: Why wouldn’t he?

By Kevin Hall

A lot of political pundits are convinced that Mike Huckabee is not running for President.  Nationally known columnists, local strategists, even the founder of this website all seem to agree.  They say Huckabee is in a good spot right now and will not want to go through the rigors of another campaign.  I am not one of those people.

The case against Huckabee running makes a lot of sense.  He is building a $3 million house in Florida.  He has a nice gig working for Fox News Channel, hosting daily ABC radio segments, making high dollar speaking engagements and promoting his latest book.  Huckabee openly talks about his distaste of campaign life.  There is also the matter of four dead Washington State police officers, which Huckabee’s opponents will inevitably, and justifiably, connect to him.   Why would he run for President?

Perhaps the question we should ask is why wouldn’t he?  Huckabee won the 2008 Iowa Caucus by nine points.  He almost won South Carolina.  Then, although his chances of winning the nomination were miniscule at that point, voters chose Huckabee in West Virginia, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Tennessee, Kansas and Louisiana.  Three years later, he is at or near the top in every national poll.  He certainly would be the favorite in Iowa.  If he wins Iowa, he probably takes South Carolina this time.  Then, the other states will fall in line.  Huckabee has the clearest path to victory in the GOP primary.

Let me be clear.  I hope the pundits are right and Huckabee does not run.  If he does, I will not caucus for him.  I have no idea who I will support, but it will not be Mike Huckabee.  I believe the Republican Party can do much better.  Despite that, I believe Huckabee has a better chance than anyone to capture the nomination.

Some say it is too late.  He shows no signs of getting into the race.  They claim Huckabee is not laying the groundwork and his fundraising has not kicked into gear.  How soon they forget.  Some of the same people who talk about his lack of fundraising often like to remind us he won Iowa in 2008 on a shoestring budget.

These pundits also do not take into account three important factors.  One is the national platform that Fox News continues to provide him, despite stripping that edge from Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum earlier this week.  Second, many of Huckabee’s 2008 backers are still patiently waiting for him to jump in the race.

Third, and most important, the pundits seemingly have no idea that there is already groundwork being laid to build upon Huckabee’s Iowa base.  It is called the “Capturing the Momentum” tour, currently underway, starring Huckabee’s buddy and 2008 state chair Bob Vander Plaats.

Halfway through the 99-county swing, the effort to build a statewide, grassroots network of social conservatives seems to be very successful.  While a few events have drawn only a handful of people, Vander Plaats is packing them in at other stops, including over 50 in Marshalltown, Newton and Oskaloosa, 65 in Garner, and 150 in Pella.  Vander Plaats is getting better attendance at some of these  events than he got during his last gubernatorial campaign.

The Vander Plaats wing of the Iowa Republican Party is energized.  Despite a disappointing defeat last June in the primary, Vander Plaats and his flock bounced back with a resounding and unprecedented ousting of three Supreme Court justices in November.  The “Capturing the Momentum” tour, in line with its title, is an effort to keep that momentum going.

Although Vander Plaats is not openly advocating for Huckabee at these events, he does name drop the former Arkansas Governor quite often.  Many of Vander Plaats’ supporters backed Huckabee in 2008.  Many of the new supporters BVP is trying to lure to the FAMiLY Leader’s congregation are preachers and churchgoers.  They are hoping to line up a “church ambassador” in all 99 Iowa counties.  The church ambassador fee comes with a $1,000 annual price tag.  But it also allows the FAMiLY Leader access to an entire congregation.

That is Huckabee’s constituency.  The evangelicals.  Despite a faltering economy, they place social issues far above economic ones.  In fact, they say they are tied together.  They are fiercely loyal to Vander Plaats.  Many of them are still fiercely loyal to Huckabee.

So, could Huckabee step into the race as last as August, as Vander Plaats suggests, and still win?  Yes.  How?  Because his core supporters are still behind him.  Not only that, Huckabee is practically guaranteed to earn the endorsement and full backing of the FAMiLY Leader, if he runs.  And all the fixings that come with that entrée.

What would that mean?  Consider the 92,000 people who supported BVP in the 2010 primary.  How significant is that number?   Do the math.  If one third of BVP’s supporters caucus for Huckabee, he wins. Huckabee rolled to victory in 2008 with 34,000 votes.

The grassroots groundwork is being laid.  The poll numbers are positive.  The environment to beat Obama, while certainly difficult, it is favorable.  And it favors Mike Huckabee the most.

Photo by Dave Davidson

Trump Dips Toe Into Iowa’s Presidential Waters

Trump Dips Toe Into Iowa’s Presidential Waters

Donald Trump continued his media blitz regarding a potential presidential campaign yesterday.  Trump joined Dave Price of WHO TV 13, who was a guest host on WHO Radio yesterday for a brief interview.  Trump’s interview was similar to the one he game to Rush Limbaugh the day before.

Trump flirted with a presidential run 2000 before dismissing the notion, but this time around he seems more serious.  Trump’s Executive Vice President and Special Counsel, Mike Cohen, travels to Iowa next week to have talks with Republican officials and key activists.

Below is Price’s interview with Trump

 

Huckabee: How Do We Get Washington Back On Track?

Huckabee: How Do We Get Washington Back On Track?

Tomorrow, I kick-off my book tour for A Simple Government. I wrote this book because I am sick and tired of watching the Obama administration and the career politicians in Washington stumble over decision after decision.

A Simple Government is about the twelve things I believe we really need from Washington to get the country back on the right track.

It’s my hope these twelve essential truths will have you nodding in agreement, whether you’re a Republican, an Independent, or even an open-minded Democrat. I believe they can help us put aside our differences, tone down the partisanship, and return to the simple principles of the Founding Fathers: liberty, justice, personal freedom, and civic virtue. And they can help us tackle even the most seemingly complicated of today’s problems.

These are just some of the things I discuss:

You can’t spend what you don’t have; you can’t borrow what you can’t pay back.
Families, businesses, towns, cities, and states all have to balance their budgets or face dire consequences. Why shouldn’t the federal government be held to the same standard? And if that means making some hard choices now, it’s a far better alternative than saddling our kids and grandkids.

The further you drift from shore, the more likely you are to be lost at sea.
The Founders expected the federal government to be subordinate to state and local governments. How can politicians in DC know the best way to help farmers in Iowa, autoworkers in Michigan, or teachers in California? They can’t. So every problem should be solved at the most local level capable of solving it.

Bullies in the playground only understand one thing. There’s a time and place for diplomacy, but we can’t protect the country just by negotiating with our enemies. We need a strong national defense and a counterterrorism policy that focuses on effectiveness, not political correctness.

The most important form of government is the family. In the long run, the only way to ensure prosperity, safety, and equal opportunity is to make sure we raise our children to be ethical and productive citizens. No bureaucracy can replace parents in that essential role, so we have to do everything possible to help parents do their job.

As I said, I have laid out twelve foundational ideas for the reclaiming of our government by “We the People.” I hope, you will take a moment and learn about my new book because I truly believe you’ll agree with and enjoy much of what I’ve written. You can learn more about A Simple Government by visiting my website here.

You can also learn more about the book tour, RSVP for one of its stops and find useful links to help you purchase the book.

Please keep an eye on your email inbox for another message from me early next week about the book and how the tour is going. Enjoy the remainder of your weekend!

With gratitude,

Mike Huckabee

P.S. Learn more about my new book A Simple Government by visiting my website here.

Photo by Dave Davidson